[编者注] 一大早起来，小编查阅邮件，就见到《加华新闻》Deputy C.O.O Joe Zhang发来的邮件，也就是下面刊出的声明。而附后的The Globe and Mail原文，来自网络。出现这样的报道，华人社区也许该好好自省一番！欢迎仁人志士评论、建议。
The Globe and Mail(环球邮报)歪曲事实，《加华新闻》保留追究其法律责任
The Globe and Mail在2015年8月6日发表一篇题为”Chinese Canadian Post editor says she was fired over Chan critique”(转载附后)的报道，称本报辞去编辑Ms.Helen Wang是因她发表非议陈国治厅长的文章，并称本报受中国驻多伦多总领事馆的政治影响，这完全有违事实。我们真不知道堂堂百年历史的全国大报，不经调查核实，随便发表影响别人声誉的报道，在此质问”环球邮报”，传媒标准何在？社会正义何在？事实上，本报辞去Ms. Helen Wang是从她任编辑的全面表现和本报的员工需要上考虑，而非政治因素。
“加华新闻”是一份服务社区，促进社团团结，社区和谐，各族人民相互了解，和客观介绍加拿大三级政府政策大事，帮助华裔新移民扎根加国社会的周刊。本报在社区享有崇高信誉，决不容许别人随意啡谤中伤。
“加华新闻”在此郑重声明，保留对”环球邮报”2015年8月6日报道中伤本报的法律责任。
编者注：下文转自环球邮报官网。
Chinese Canadian Post editor says she was fired over Chan critique
The editor-in-chief of a Chinese-language newspaper says she was forced out of her job for publishing a column that criticized the conduct of Ontario cabinet minister Michael Chan.
In a statement released to The Globe and Mail, the former editor of the Chinese Canadian Post, Helen Wang, said she was ousted after the Toronto-based periodical received complaints from the Chinese consulate in Toronto and pro-Beijing groups that back the minister.
In June, The Globe identified Mr. Chan as the subject of a 2010 CSIS briefing to Queen’s Park that alleged an unusual closeness to China’s Toronto consulate. The spy agency never investigated the minister, nor was he ever suspected of a crime.
Written by freelancer Jonathan Fon, the June 26 commentary chastised Mr. Chan, Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and International Trade, for implying that the spy agency’s concerns about him cast suspicion over all minorities. Mr. Fon argued that the concerns were solely about Mr. Chan.
Ms. Wang said that after Mr. Fon’s article ran, her boss, Joe Zhang, told her the paper received complaints, including from the consulate and the paper’s proprietor, Cheng Yi Wei, who also is president of the Confederation of Toronto Chinese Canadian Organizations (CTCCO).
The confederation is known in the community for its close ties to the consulate and the provincial and federal Liberals. Ms. Wang was dismissed on July 17.
Mr. Fon’s column – and its alleged consequences – underscore a wider debate in his community: whether the Chan affair questions the loyalty of all Chinese-Canadians or one politician’s behaviour.
Initially, CSIS director Richard Fadden publicly aired concerns in June, 2010, that two provincial Crown ministers were under the influence of foreign governments. He did not mention names or provinces. Around the end of that summer, a senior official from CSIS paid a rare visit to the province’s secretary of cabinet to express concern about Mr. Chan’s rapport with the consulate. In October of that same year, Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty, through a spokeswoman, told the Toronto Star that CSIS provided nothing of substance that would suggest any minister was under such influence.
The Globe also reported last month that Mr. Chan lobbied for a deal between the Toronto District School Board and the Confucius Institute, a controversial Mandarin language and culture program run by the Chinese government. He also hired two aides with troubling résumés: one with a background of organizing protests and counterprotests that advance the Chinese agenda, and one who was implicated in removing anti-Beijing sentiment from a Chinese-language daily newspaper – and now works as a press secretary in the office of Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne.
Mr. Chan called The Globe articles a “deeply offensive personal attack” and is suing the paper. Ms. Wynne has publicly supported Mr. Chan. She told The Canadian Press in June that she asked her staff to revisit the CSIS concerns and said there was “still nothing of substance,” but did not specify how the allegations were vetted.
While his many allies accuse CSIS and The Globe of singling him out as a result of his Chinese background, Mr. Chan views the revelations as an attack on the loyalty of all newer Canadians. Others in his community, however, see the controversy through a much more narrow lens. “About 80 per cent of the people who come on to my program disagree with Michael Chan,” said Tony Yu, a guest host of Fairchild Radio’s Mandarin Talk Show. “They see him playing the race card, and it’s not good for the community. He made the Chinese main street angry. He should have just made a statement that CSIS was wrong, not put the whole community behind his back. He’s doing something just for him.”
At the centre of this latest controversy is the Chinese Canadian Post, a small newspaper with a dubious journalistic legacy. “It used to be called the Red Army Post,” said Thomas Saras, president of the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada, adding that the bulk of the periodical was printed on the mainland, adding a page or two of Canadian content. “It was Chinese propaganda.”
In the past three years, Mr. Saras said, the paper fell on hard times. Mr. Wei, a supermarket-chain owner and CTCCO president, recently took it over. (Mr. Wei could not be reached for comment.)
While its critics say that the CTCCO is too close to the consulate, honorary chair Ping Tan told The Globe in an unrelated interview last April that it is independent of the Chinese consulate and does not receive money from it.“When there are issues that concern Chinese Canadians, we speak up,” Mr. Tan said, adding that his group promotes Chinese languages and culture while encouraging new arrivals to embrace their new country.
On June 30, the confederation held a press conference to support Mr. Chan and demand an apology from The Globe. “We finally concluded that this is not only Chan’s problem, rather, it is a big issue that involves all of our Chinese people, Chinese Canadians, and our Chinese communities,” Mr. Wei said at the event, while reinforcing his group’s relationship with China.
Ms. Wang recalled in her statement that on the day of the press conference, her boss instructed her to minimize the damage at all costs by running as many pro-Chan articles as she could muster. She said Mr. Zhang told her the paper had paid delivery workers extra money to retrieve the June 26 papers from the marketplace. Pushing back, she said she insisted that it was important to offer another side of the story.
From then on, Ms. Wang said, she felt marginalized in the workplace. She later discovered, on July 17, that she was locked out of the newspaper’s e-mail system and was called into her boss’s office, where she received a dismissal notice.
When asked why he fired his editor, Mr. Zhang refused to elaborate. “That’s a company decision,” he said. “I don’t think I need to talk to anyone about it.” (Source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/chinese-canadian-post-editor-says-she-was-fired-over-chan-critique/article25855965)
