自竞选开始，唐民凯一直学哈珀回避记者和国民。唐民凯最终会开始回答一些问题吗？唐民凯会向餐饮业员工坦白说明新民主党提出的”联邦最低时薪”政策完全帮不到他们吗？
唐民凯自相矛盾的主要问题：
1. 为什么唐民凯误导加拿大人，新民主党鼓吹的增加“联邦最低时薪”政策原来只适用与不到1%的加拿大劳工？
2. 为什么唐民凯反对杜鲁多给中产家庭每年能省最多至$1,350的减税计划？
3. 为什么唐民凯反对杜鲁多要“让加拿大最高收入者贡献多一点点，来给其他家庭减轻一点负担”的计划？
4. 为什么唐民凯就同一话题在国家不同地区表达不同的立场？“(唐民凯)在新民主党自相矛盾的立场中游走……新民主党党领游移在相对的立场之间，在国家某地域所持的立场会让他们在其他地域有麻烦……在魁北克为他们赢取选票的政策却会在国内其他地区毒害他们。”(《国家邮报》，2015年7月20日)
5. 为什么唐民凯想要废除《透明法案》，让分裂主义者更容易分裂国家？
杜鲁多是唯一的总理候选人有真正变革的计划，发展经济，帮助中产，重建公平。
Mulcair still avoiding questions about empty NDP promises
After doing his best Stephen Harper impression by avoiding journalists and Canadians since the campaign started, will Thomas Mulcair finally start providing some answers?
Will Mulcair come clean with restaurant workers about his minimum wage mirage that does not apply to any restaurant employee in Canada?
Key questions about Mulcair’s contradictions:
1.Why is Thomas Mulcair misleading Canadians by touting a “federal minimum wage” increase that will apply to less than one percent of the Canadian workforce?
2.Why does Thomas Mulcair oppose Justin Trudeau’s plan to save middle class families up to $1,350 per year by lowering the middle class tax bracket?
3.Why does Thomas Mulcair oppose Justin Trudeau’s plan to ask Canada’s top earners to pay a little more, so middle class families can pay a little less?
4.Why does Thomas Mulcair say different things in different parts of the country on the exact same topic? “[Mulcair] tap-dances around NDP contradictions… The NDP leader weaved his way between competing positions that threaten to get him trouble in one part of the country or another… policies that are winners for them in Quebec, are toxic for them in the rest of the country.” (National Post, July 20, 2015)
5.Why does Thomas Mulcair want to rip up the Clarity Act, making it easier to break up Canada?
Justin Trudeau is the only candidate for Prime Minister with a plan for real change to grow the economy, help the middle class, and restore fairness.
